YearToAvoid

2009 Ford Taurus Reliability Data: Problems & Recalls

Good The 2009 Ford Taurus has a complaint index of 43 and ranks 9th out of 15 model years, earning a Good verdict. NHTSA lists no recalls for this year. Engine complaints dominate at 52% of reports, with a median failure mileage of 10,994 miles.

Based on NHTSA complaints per model-year, not a reliability rating. Methodology

YearToAvoid Scorecard

Complaint Index
43/100
#9 of 15 Taurus years
Verdict
Good
vs. other years of this model
Complaints
64
unique NHTSA reports
Recalls
0
distinct NHTSA campaigns
Crashes
9
reported in complaints
Fires
1
Injuries
9
Top issue
Engine
Best nearby year
2012
rated Best
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated
EPA combined MPG
20
17.5 city / 26 hwy
Injuries / deaths
9 / 0

Top 2009 Ford Taurus problems

Share of this year’s NHTSA complaints by component group. Groups with 15+ complaints have their own page.

  1. Engine33 (52%)
  2. Brakes7 (11%)
  3. Airbags6 (9%)
  4. Suspension, Wheels & Tires6 (9%)
  5. Other5 (8%)
  6. Transmission & Powertrain5 (8%)
  7. Electrical System4 (6%)
  8. Fuel System2 (3%)
  9. Structure & Body2 (3%)
  10. Visibility & Wipers2 (3%)

A complaint can list more than one component, so shares add up to more than 100%. Shares are % of complaints.

What owners report

  • Owners report unintended acceleration or sudden lunging when shifting from reverse to drive, sometimes ending in a crash.
  • Some describe the engine surging or the throttle sticking while moving at low speed.
  • Airbags reportedly failed to deploy in multiple frontal and side-impact crashes, despite significant vehicle damage.
  • One owner reported the ignition key overheating, melting, and detaching, causing the vehicle to stall.
  • A few owners described the engine stalling unexpectedly while coasting downhill with the foot off the gas.
2009 Ford Taurus complaints: complaints filed per month5Feb 2009Oct 2009Aug 2010Jun 2011Jan 2013Jun 2015Apr 2017Nov 2020
64 complaints filed with NHTSA from Feb 2009 to Sep 2023; peak Jun 2009 (5).

2009 Ford Taurus recalls

No safety recalls on record for this model year.

2009 Ford Taurus fuel economy and fuel cost

City
17.5 MPG
Highway
26 MPG
Combined
20 MPG
Annual fuel cost (EPA)
$3,250
15,000 mi/yr
Fuel
Regular
Current regular gas
$4.32/gal
national avg.

EPA figures; median across configurations of this model year. Estimate your own cost with the fuel cost calculator.

2009 compared with other Taurus years

Complaint Index by model year (0 = fewest issues, 100 = most)0255075100’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19
Complaint Index: 0 = fewest issues, 100 = most, relative to other years of this model. Avoid Caution Good Best
YearVerdictIndexComplaintsRecallsMPG
2007Good36149020
2008Caution50175120.5
2009Good4364020
2010Avoid86204320.5
2011Caution71187420.5

All Ford Taurus years: best and worst →

Frequently asked questions

Is the 2009 Ford Taurus reliable?
NHTSA data gives the 2009 Taurus a complaint index of 43, ranking 9th out of 15 model years, with a Good verdict relative to other Taurus years.
Does the 2009 Ford Taurus have any recalls?
NHTSA lists zero recalls for the 2009 Ford Taurus.
What is the biggest problem with the 2009 Ford Taurus?
Engine issues are the top problem area, making up 52% of complaints, with a median failure mileage of 10,994 miles.
Did the 2009 Ford Taurus have airbag problems?
NHTSA lists 6 airbag complaints for the 2009 Taurus, including 6 crashes, with several owners reporting airbags that failed to deploy in collisions.
How does the 2009 Ford Taurus compare to other Taurus years?
The 2009 model's complaint index of 43 is lower than the 2005 (93), 2013 (100), and 2010 (86) model years, all rated Avoid, making 2009 a comparatively safer choice.

Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation complaint and recall databases; U.S. EPA fuel economy data; NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings. Complaints are unverified owner reports.

Data updated Sep 24, 2026. Read the methodology and data sources. The Complaint Index is based on NHTSA owner complaints and recalls; it is not a reliability rating.