YearToAvoid

2006 Ford Taurus Reliability Data: Problems & Recalls

Caution The 2006 Ford Taurus has a Complaint Index of 64 and ranks 6th worst out of 15 model years, earning a Caution verdict. Engine problems dominate at 62% of complaints (198), with median failure mileage of 91,500 miles.

Based on NHTSA complaints per model-year, not a reliability rating. Methodology

YearToAvoid Scorecard

Complaint Index
64/100
#6 of 15 Taurus years
Verdict
Caution
vs. other years of this model
Complaints
318
unique NHTSA reports
Recalls
2
distinct NHTSA campaigns
Crashes
19
reported in complaints
Fires
4
Injuries
12
Top issue
Engine
Best nearby year
2012
rated Best
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated
EPA combined MPG
20
17.5 city / 25 hwy
Injuries / deaths
12 / 1

Top 2006 Ford Taurus problems

Share of this year’s NHTSA complaints by component group. Groups with 15+ complaints have their own page.

  1. Engine198 (62%)
  2. Transmission & Powertrain32 (10%)
  3. Brakes30 (9%)
  4. Electrical System30 (9%)
  5. Airbags21 (7%)
  6. Fuel System18 (6%)
  7. Structure & Body17 (5%)
  8. Other12 (4%)
  9. Suspension, Wheels & Tires9 (3%)
  10. Visibility & Wipers9 (3%)

A complaint can list more than one component, so shares add up to more than 100%. Shares are % of complaints.

What owners report

  • Vehicles have surged or accelerated unexpectedly at low speeds, sometimes crashing into walls or ditches with the throttle apparently sticking.
  • Owners report brakes losing pressure suddenly, sometimes preceded by a hissing air sound, leading to loss of stopping power.
  • Frontal airbags have failed to deploy in crashes at highway speeds and in rollovers, even in vehicles that were destroyed.
  • Electrical failures have caused smoke, illuminated oil/battery/engine warning lights, and loud noises during operation.
  • A tie rod bolt and rod broke at low mileage, causing a loss of steering control shortly after purchase.
2006 Ford Taurus complaints: complaints filed per quarter382005 Q32007 Q42009 Q42011 Q42013 Q42015 Q42017 Q42021 Q1
318 complaints filed with NHTSA from 2005 Q3 to 2024 Q3; peak 2012 Q1 (38).

2006 Ford Taurus recalls

2 NHTSA recall campaigns list this model year.

  1. NHTSA 06V119000Apr 10, 2006Electrical System19 vehicles

    Electrical system: instrument cluster/panel

    Certain passenger vehicles built for one specific fleet customer were modified for optional hands-free cellular phone operating capability. To provide this functionality, a special overlay wire harness was installed that inadvertently did not include the circuits for passenger air bag deactivation indicator (padi) lamp function. As a result, these vehicles do not comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 208, 'occupant crash protection.'

    Risk: The padi lamp will fail to illuminate and the air bag warning lamp in the cluster will stay illuminated.

    Remedy: The fleet customer was notified and all vehicles have been repaired. The recall began on april 28, 2006.

  2. NHTSA 05V520000Nov 9, 2005Visibility & Wipers199,942 vehicles

    Visibility:windshield wiper/washer:motor

    On certain trucks, passenger cars and sport utility vehicles, the windshield wiper motor may have been produced without grease being applied to the output shaft gear.

    Risk: After a period of continuous use on the high speed setting, lack of grease on the output shaft gear may cause the gear to distort or fracture during operation resulting in a loss of wiper function. Inoperative wipers under inclement weather conditions could cause a crash due to impaired visibility.

    Remedy: Dealers will inspect the wiper motor for the presence of grease and grease the wiper motor gears if necessary. The recall began on november 22, 2005. Owners may contact ford at 1-800-392-3673 or lincoln/mercury at 1-800-521-4140.

2006 Ford Taurus fuel economy and fuel cost

City
17.5 MPG
Highway
25 MPG
Combined
20 MPG
Annual fuel cost (EPA)
$3,250
15,000 mi/yr
Fuel
Regular
Current regular gas
$4.32/gal
national avg.

EPA figures; median across configurations of this model year. Estimate your own cost with the fuel cost calculator.

2006 compared with other Taurus years

Complaint Index by model year (0 = fewest issues, 100 = most)0255075100’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19
Complaint Index: 0 = fewest issues, 100 = most, relative to other years of this model. Avoid Caution Good Best
YearVerdictIndexComplaintsRecallsMPG
2005Avoid93774019.5
2006Caution64318220
2007Good36149020
2008Caution50175120.5

All Ford Taurus years: best and worst →

Frequently asked questions

Is the 2006 Ford Taurus reliable?
NHTSA data shows a Complaint Index of 64 for the 2006 Taurus, ranking 6th worst among 15 model years, so it carries a Caution verdict relative to other Taurus years.
What are the most common problems with the 2006 Ford Taurus?
Engine complaints make up 62% of all reports (198 complaints), with a median failure mileage of 91,500 miles. Transmission/powertrain, brakes, and electrical issues each account for 9-10% of complaints.
Does the 2006 Ford Taurus have any recalls?
NHTSA lists two recalls for the 2006 Taurus: one for an electrical wire harness issue affecting a specific fleet customer, and one for windshield wiper motors that may lack grease on the output shaft gear. Neither is a do-not-drive recall.
How does the 2006 Taurus compare to other years?
The 2006 model's Complaint Index of 64 is lower than 2005 (93, Avoid) and 2013 (100, Avoid), but higher than 2007 (36, Good) and 2012 (14, Best), placing it in the Caution range.
Did the 2006 Ford Taurus have airbag problems?
NHTSA logged 21 airbag complaints for the 2006 Taurus, 7% of the total, including reports of frontal airbags failing to deploy in crashes and rollovers, with a median failure mileage of 72,000 miles.

Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation complaint and recall databases; U.S. EPA fuel economy data; NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings. Complaints are unverified owner reports.

Data updated Sep 24, 2026. Read the methodology and data sources. The Complaint Index is based on NHTSA owner complaints and recalls; it is not a reliability rating.