YearToAvoid

2007 Ford Taurus Reliability Data: Problems & Recalls

Good The 2007 Ford Taurus ranks 10th of 15 model years with a complaint index of 36 and earns a Good verdict relative to other Taurus years. It has no recalls, 149 NHTSA complaints, and its top problem area is the engine at 53% of complaints.

Based on NHTSA complaints per model-year, not a reliability rating. Methodology

YearToAvoid Scorecard

Complaint Index
36/100
#10 of 15 Taurus years
Verdict
Good
vs. other years of this model
Complaints
149
unique NHTSA reports
Recalls
0
distinct NHTSA campaigns
Crashes
8
reported in complaints
Fires
0
Injuries
6
Top issue
Engine
Best nearby year
2012
rated Best
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated
EPA combined MPG
20
18 city / 25 hwy
Injuries / deaths
6 / 0

Top 2007 Ford Taurus problems

Share of this year’s NHTSA complaints by component group. Groups with 15+ complaints have their own page.

  1. Engine79 (53%)
  2. Electrical System29 (19%)
  3. Transmission & Powertrain16 (11%)
  4. Brakes11 (7%)
  5. Other10 (7%)
  6. Structure & Body9 (6%)
  7. Fuel System8 (5%)
  8. Airbags7 (5%)
  9. Suspension, Wheels & Tires6 (4%)
  10. Steering5 (3%)

A complaint can list more than one component, so shares add up to more than 100%. Shares are % of complaints.

What owners report

  • Owners report sudden unexpected acceleration or stalling while shifting or driving at low speed, sometimes ending in a crash.
  • Some describe the vehicle lurching forward on its own after being shifted into park.
  • Airbags failed to deploy in multiple reported crashes, including a deer strike and a low-speed collision into a building.
  • Brakes reportedly lost stopping power on a city street, requiring repeated pumping to slow down.
  • Electrical complaints describe long crank times or intermittent no-start conditions that dealers could not duplicate.
  • One owner reported the exhaust pipe detaching from a weld failure while backing up.
2007 Ford Taurus complaints: complaints filed per quarter132006 Q42009 Q32011 Q22013 Q12014 Q42016 Q42018 Q32023 Q1
149 complaints filed with NHTSA from 2006 Q4 to 2023 Q1; peak 2012 Q1 (13).

2007 Ford Taurus recalls

No safety recalls on record for this model year.

2007 Ford Taurus fuel economy and fuel cost

City
18 MPG
Highway
25 MPG
Combined
20 MPG
Annual fuel cost (EPA)
$3,250
15,000 mi/yr
Fuel
Regular
Current regular gas
$4.32/gal
national avg.

EPA figures; median across configurations of this model year. Estimate your own cost with the fuel cost calculator.

2007 compared with other Taurus years

Complaint Index by model year (0 = fewest issues, 100 = most)0255075100’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19
Complaint Index: 0 = fewest issues, 100 = most, relative to other years of this model. Avoid Caution Good Best
YearVerdictIndexComplaintsRecallsMPG
2005Avoid93774019.5
2006Caution64318220
2007Good36149020
2008Caution50175120.5
2009Good4364020

All Ford Taurus years: best and worst →

Frequently asked questions

Is the 2007 Ford Taurus reliable?
Compared with other Taurus model years, the 2007 rates Good, with a complaint index of 36 and 149 NHTSA complaints, ranking 10th out of 15 years tracked.
Does the 2007 Ford Taurus have any recalls?
NHTSA lists zero recalls for the 2007 Ford Taurus.
What is the most common problem with the 2007 Ford Taurus?
Engine problems make up 53% of complaints (79 of 149), with a median failure mileage of 94,831 miles.
How does the 2007 Taurus compare to the 2005 and 2013 Taurus?
The 2007 Taurus (index 36) is far less complained-about than the 2005 (index 93, Avoid) and 2013 (index 100, Avoid), which are the worst-rated years.
What is the fuel economy of the 2007 Ford Taurus?
The EPA rates it at 20 mpg combined (18 city/25 highway), with an estimated annual fuel cost of $3,250.

Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation complaint and recall databases; U.S. EPA fuel economy data; NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings. Complaints are unverified owner reports.

Data updated Sep 24, 2026. Read the methodology and data sources. The Complaint Index is based on NHTSA owner complaints and recalls; it is not a reliability rating.