YearToAvoid

2013 Toyota Sequoia Reliability Data: Problems & Recalls

Best The 2013 Toyota Sequoia ranks 15th worst out of 18 model years, with a complaint index of 18 and just 12 complaints on file. NHTSA lists 2 recalls (steering and lug nuts) with no crashes, fires, injuries, or deaths reported. It carries a Best verdict relative to other Sequoia years.

Based on NHTSA complaints per model-year, not a reliability rating. Methodology

YearToAvoid Scorecard

Complaint Index
18/100
#15 of 18 Sequoia years
Verdict
Best
vs. other years of this model
Complaints
12
unique NHTSA reports
Recalls
2
distinct NHTSA campaigns
Crashes
0
reported in complaints
Fires
0
Injuries
0
Top issue
Engine
Best nearby year
2015
rated Best
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated
EPA combined MPG
15
13 city / 17 hwy
Injuries / deaths
0 / 0

Top 2013 Toyota Sequoia problems

Share of this year’s NHTSA complaints by component group. Groups with 15+ complaints have their own page.

  1. Engine4 (33%)
  2. Other3 (25%)
  3. Structure & Body2 (17%)
  4. Suspension, Wheels & Tires2 (17%)
  5. Airbags1 (8%)
  6. Brakes1 (8%)
  7. Electrical System1 (8%)
  8. Transmission & Powertrain1 (8%)
  9. Visibility & Wipers1 (8%)

A complaint can list more than one component, so shares add up to more than 100%. Shares are % of complaints.

What owners report

  • Some owners report the engine's computer misreads fuel ethanol content on flex-fuel 5.7L models, causing rough cold starts, power loss, or sudden RPM dropout.
  • Owners describe the factory-installed tire disintegrating or blowing out at highway speed.
  • Some report the airbag warning light illuminating years into ownership due to a short in the driver's side knee airbag assembly.
  • Owners describe windshield wipers running slower than normal, reducing visibility in heavy rain.
  • Some report the driver's side dashboard becoming sticky and melted, producing a chemical odor inside the cabin.
  • Owners describe chrome lug nuts swelling so the factory lug wrench no longer fits, leaving them unable to change a flat tire.
2013 Toyota Sequoia complaints: complaints filed per month2Sep 2014Mar 2016Nov 2018Jan 2020Jan 2022Feb 2026
12 complaints filed with NHTSA from Sep 2014 to Feb 2026; peak Nov 2018 (2).

2013 Toyota Sequoia recalls

2 NHTSA recall campaigns list this model year.

  1. NHTSA 21V920000Nov 23, 2021Steering22,462 vehicles

    Steering:rack and pinion

    Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2008-2022 Sequoia and 2007-2021 Tundra vehicles. The power steering gear assembly may have been manufactured incorrectly, which can result in an oil leak.

    Risk: An oil leak may cause a sudden loss of power steering assist, increasing the risk of a crash.

    Remedy: Dealers will inspect and replace the power steering gear assembly as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed on January 21, 2022. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for this recall are 21TB10 and 21TA10.

  2. NHTSA 17V311000May 11, 2017Suspension, Wheels & Tires1,325 vehicles

    Wheels:lugs/nuts/bolts/studs

    Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC (SET) is recalling certain model year 2013-2017 Toyota Tundra and Sequoia vehicles accessorized with Southeast Toyota accessory 20-inch Rockstar wheels installed by Southeast Toyota or a Southeast Toyota dealer. The Rockstar wheels were installed with lugnuts that may crack and detach.

    Risk: Lugnuts that crack and detach may cause the wheels to separate from the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

    Remedy: SET will notify owners, and dealers will install new replacement lugnuts, free of charge. The recall began June 23, 2017. Owners may contact SET customer service at 1-866-405-4226. SET's number for this recall is SET17A.

2013 Toyota Sequoia fuel economy and fuel cost

City
13 MPG
Highway
17 MPG
Combined
15 MPG
Annual fuel cost (EPA)
$4,300
15,000 mi/yr
Fuel
Regular
Current regular gas
$4.32/gal
national avg.

EPA figures; median across configurations of this model year. Estimate your own cost with the fuel cost calculator.

2013 compared with other Sequoia years

Complaint Index by model year (0 = fewest issues, 100 = most)0255075100’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19’20’21’22
Complaint Index: 0 = fewest issues, 100 = most, relative to other years of this model. Avoid Caution Good Best
YearVerdictIndexComplaintsRecallsMPG
2011Good4117615
2012Caution7120315
2013Best1812215
2014Good3517215
2015Best129215

All Toyota Sequoia years: best and worst →

Frequently asked questions

Is the 2013 Toyota Sequoia reliable?
Based on NHTSA owner complaints and recalls, the 2013 Sequoia ranks 15th worst out of 18 model years, with a complaint index of 18 and only 12 complaints, earning a Best verdict relative to other Sequoia years.
What problems does the 2013 Toyota Sequoia have?
The top problem area is the Engine, making up 33% of complaints, including flex-fuel sensing issues and reports of oil leaking near the cam tower. Structure & Body and Suspension, Wheels & Tires each account for 17% of complaints.
Does the 2013 Toyota Sequoia have any recalls?
NHTSA lists 2 recalls for the 2013 Sequoia: one for a power steering gear assembly that may leak oil, and one for Southeast Toyota accessory lug nuts on 20-inch Rockstar wheels. Neither is a do-not-drive recall.
How does the 2013 Sequoia compare to other Sequoia years?
The 2013 model has a complaint index of 18, far lower than years like 2005 (100) or 2006 (94), which are rated Avoid. Among all 18 model years, 2013 ranks 15th worst, meaning it's among the better years.
What is the fuel economy of the 2013 Toyota Sequoia?
EPA rates the 2013 Sequoia at 15 mpg combined (13 city / 17 highway), with an estimated annual fuel cost of $4,300.

Sources: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation complaint and recall databases; U.S. EPA fuel economy data; NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings. Complaints are unverified owner reports.

Data updated Sep 24, 2026. Read the methodology and data sources. The Complaint Index is based on NHTSA owner complaints and recalls; it is not a reliability rating.